MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415076175 · doi:10.1109/wamicon.2016.7483842

Surface crack detection in metallic materials using sensitive microwave-based sensors

2016· article· en· W2415076175 on OpenAlexaff
Ali M. Albishi, Omar M. Ramahi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceGround planeMicrowaveResonatorMicrostripPrinted circuit boardAcousticsSensitivity (control systems)OptoelectronicsResonance (particle physics)Split-ring resonatorMiniaturizationOpticsElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a highly sensitive sensor inspired by complementary split-ring resonators (CSRRs). The resonators are electrically small and designed as a near-field sensor to detect surface cracks in metallic surfaces. The sensor is etched in the ground plane of a microstrip line and fabricated using printed circuit board technology (PCB). Compared to available microwave techniques, the sensor introduced here has key advantages including high sensitivity (increasing dynamic range of the sensor), spatial resolution, design simplicity and scalability. The sensor is able numerically to detect a crack of 10 um (equivalent to λ/3400), with 200 MHz shift in the resonance frequency. For a surface crack having 200 μm width and 2 mm depth, the numerical result showed a shift in the resonance frequency of more than 2 GHz. This resonance frequency shift exceeds what can be achieved using other sensors operating in the low GHZ frequency regime by significant margin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207