MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415076482

Nicotine dependence perpetuating tobacco smoking may be treatable by drugs acting at glutamate receptors.

2004· article· en· W2415076482 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Athina Markou

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbstinenceEnvironmental healthNicotineQuarter (Canadian coin)Tobacco harm reductionPopulationSmoking cessationTobacco useDemographyPsychiatryGeographyPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extract: By the year 2020 tobacco smoking will become the single largest health problem worldwide leading to approximately 8.4 million deaths annually. In the USA alone, tobacco smoking leads to serious illness in an estimated 8.6 million people, causing roughly 440,000 deaths annually, and approximately $157 billion in health-related economic costs. On average, smoking leads to a loss of 12 healthy years and reduces the lifespan by 8 years. Almost a quarter of the USA population are tobacco smokers. The percentage of smokers is even higher in some other countries, and there is an alarming increase of tobacco use in the developing countries. The cost of tobacco smoking to society is tremendous in terms of health problems that frequently lead to death, medical costs and human suffering. In the USA and Europe, 70% of all smokers have considered quitting smoking at least once, and 35% try to quit at least once a year. Yet only approximately 6% succeed in maintaining abstinence. Therefore, there is a great need for the discovery and development of new treatments to assist people in achieving and maintaining abstinence from tobacco smoking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207