Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a single institution case review.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC). STUDY DESIGN: All patients with NECC diagnosed between January 1990 and December, 2007 identified from the tumor registry and gynecological oncology databases at McGill University Health Centre comprised this series. RESULTS: Eleven cases were encountered. Four patients were FIGO Stage Ib1, one Stage Ib2, one Stage IIa, and the other five were advanced stages (III or IV). Ten patients had marked lymph vascular space invasion. Metastasis to the pelvic or paraortic nodes was observed in eight patients. Seven patients were treated by surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation, another two had chemoradiation and the other two only received palliative treatments. The median survival was 18 months. All three long-term survival patients were Stage Ib1 without lymph node involvement. CONCLUSION: NECC is an aggressive tumor with poor prognosis, and only early stages are potentially curable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".