MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415220180

La Ciencia Política como disciplina derivada de la Metafísica panteísta de Baruj Espinosa

2011· article· es· W2415220180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlpha Omegan · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Democracy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente estudio se propone examinar en forma comparativa, la nocion de ciencia politica, derivada tanto de la Metafisica aristotelica y neo-platonica de Tomas de Aquino, como de la Metafisica de la sustancia unica, elaborada por B. Espinosa. El estudio pone en evidencia la estructura de la ciencia politica toda vez que la misma se integra, ya sea en el interior de una Metafisica de la sustancia participada y de la analogia del ser, o bien, en el caso de espinosa, como de una Metafisica puramente racional en la cual no tienen lugar ni el concepto de participacion ni su correlato logico, el concepto de analogia del ser. La argumentacion se propone subrayar el modo en que la Metafisica espinosiana da por resultado una ciencia politica que es el fundamento teorico del totalitarismo en virtud del cual el Estado, como orden politico, se atribuye la regulacion de las creencias religiosas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it