One Case of Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome, in which the Course from Onset to Spontaneous Curing Could be Followed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The case is a 62 years old male. No polyposis was found by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or barium enema examination performed at the time of cholecystectomy in March 1994. Symptoms such as dysgeusia, diarrhea, loss of hair and atrophy of nails began to appear from May. Examination of the digestive tract performed in October revealed clustered polyposis in the stomach, duodenum, small intestine and large intestine. Pathologically, all the polyps were found to be of the juvenile type, so a diagnosis of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) was made. Histologic patterns of rectal polyp after polypectomy showed well differentiated adenocarcinoma continuous with the juvenile type polyp. The above-mentioned symptoms improved with the clinical course. At present, 6 years after the development of the disease, no recurrence of polyposis in the stomach and large intestine has been found. Our results suggest that ectodermal changes and lesions of the digestive tract in CCS appear and disappear in a short time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".