MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415296035 · doi:10.1090/proc/13967

Some new computable structures of high rank

2017· preprint· en· W2415296035 on OpenAlex
Matthew Harrison‐Trainor, Gregory Igusa, Julia F. Knight

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCountable setRank (graph theory)Computable numberMathematicsComputable analysisOmegaCategorical variableAlephCombinatoricsComputable functionDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We give several new examples of computable structures of high Scott rank. For earlier known computable structures of Scott rank <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="omega 1 Superscript upper C upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi> ω </mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\omega _1^{CK}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> , the computable infinitary theory is <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="normal alef 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal"> ℵ </mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\aleph _0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -categorical. Millar and Sacks asked whether this was always the case. We answer this question by constructing an example whose computable infinitary theory has non-isomorphic countable models. The standard known computable structures of Scott rank <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="omega 1 Superscript upper C upper K Baseline plus 1"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi> ω </mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\omega _1^{CK}+1</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> have infinite indiscernible sequences. We give two constructions with no indiscernible ordered triple.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0080.010
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it