MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415342234 · doi:10.1080/12265934.2016.1138876

The severity of earthquake events – statistical analysis and classification

2016· article· en· W2415342234 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Urban Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsNatural disasterEarthquake casualty estimationGeographyLandslideSeismologyStatisticsMeteorologyEarthquake scenarioGeologyMathematicsSeismic hazard

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Earthquake events are natural disasters that can pose a threat to people's safety as well as their homes and possessions. In this paper, the severity level of earthquake disasters is addressed using the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) database. A total of 5841 earthquake incidents are recorded that happened between 2150 BCE and 2015 CE. Few studies have done a comprehensive statistical analysis of the consequences of earthquakes. To address this gap, and after determining the probability distribution function of the number of fatalities, we evaluate the distribution of earthquakes with extreme fatalities to determine the severity levels according to the fatality-based disaster scale introduced by Wirasinghe, Caldera, Durage, and Ruwanpura [(2013). Preliminary analysis and classification of natural disasters. Proceedings of the ninth annual conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure, Renewal and Reconstruction (IIIRR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, July 2013, Section B1.2, p. 11]. To this end, three different methods of determining the extreme events are considered: peak over threshold, Rth order, and event-based and location-based block maxima. Moreover, a comprehensive collinearity analysis is performed to investigate any correlation and linear dependency between the earthquake parameters (magnitude, intensity, and focal depth) and the consequences in terms of earthquake fatalities. The severity classification based on block maxima has more detailed severity classes; hence, it is superior to the other two methods. For block maxima, the probability of a lower level disaster (Emergency to Catastrophe Type 1) being the extreme disaster is higher for the location (country)-based data set compared to the event-based worldwide data set, while the probability of a higher level disaster (Catastrophe Type 2 and above) being the extreme disaster is lower. These probabilities are to be expected because a single country, even over the full time period, is less likely to have a massive disaster compared to the world when a large number of extreme events, in this case 100, are considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it