Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper challenges the view that current intergenerational relations in adulthood are either marked by permanent unsolvable conflict or by strict autonomy. Based on a theoretical model, the paper offers an overview on current relations between adult children and parent s. The following questions will be addressed: 1. To what extent are adult children and parents who do not live in the same household any more, still connected via personal help and monetary transfers? Do they see and call each other quite regularly? Do they feel closely connected to each other? 2. To what extent are current relations between adult children and parents characterized by intergenerational conflict? 3. What are the most important determinants and consequences of intergenerational solidarity and conflict? How are intergenerational solidarity and conflict interconnected? The empirical analyses are based on two representative data bases for West and East Germany (German Ageing Survey and Gennan Socio-Economic Panel). They indicate a lifelong solidarity between adult children and parents. Pronounced conflicts should not be neglected, although they are relatively seldom. Determinants of solidarity and conflict can be identified on the basis of the proposed theoretical model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it