The effects of time, temperature, and concentration on Sr <sup>2+</sup> exchange in clinoptilolite in aqueous solutions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four grams of a clinoptilolite-rich rock, crushed to -180 mesh, were exchanged in deionized water (DI), and in 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 M solutions of SrCl2·6H2O at 5, 21, 50, and 90 °C for 0.5, 5, 24, and 240 h yielding 64 sample solutions, which were vacuum-filtered to remove solids. The solutions were analyzed by ICP-AES for the outgoing cations (i.e., Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+). The higher molarity solutions were expected to contain greater concentrations of the outgoing cations than the DI or lower molarity concentration solutions. This trend was exhibited by the monovalent and divalent cations in samples of all concentrations. Outgoing monovalent cations exchanged to greater extents with increasing time and temperature. Outgoing divalent cations of 0.01 and 0.001 M concentrations exchanged at low temperatures contained greater concentrations of outgoing divalent cations than solutions exchanged at high temperatures. The concentrations of the monovalent cations were slightly greater in the 0.001 M sample than in DI, whereas divalent cations had a similar concentration between the 0.001 M and DI treatments. Overall exchange of cations out of the clinoptilolite was favored at higher temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it