Net nitrogen mineralization in boreal fens: a potential performance indicator for peatland reclamation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Sandhill Fen reclamation watershed, commissioned by Syncrude Canada Ltd., is the first attempt to reclaim a self-sustaining peat-forming wetland on a previously mined area. Here, we quantified net nitrogen mineralization rates at Sandhill Fen in the first and second years since initiation (2013–2014). Our main objective was to determine whether nitrogen production potentials at Sandhill Fen were similar to six regional fens sampled across an ombrotrophic–minerotrophic peatland gradient. In the second year, net nitrogen mineralization rates across Sandhill Fen (2014 mean = 20.2 mg N·m −2 ·day −1 ; 0.9 mg N·kg −1 ·day −1 ) were quite comparable with the benchmark fen sites (2013–2014 pooled means = 20.6 mg N·m −2 ·day −1 ; 5.9 mg N·kg −1 ·day −1 ). However, in areas exhibiting low gravimetric soil moisture content at Sandhill Fen, net nitrification contributed more than 50% to the net N mineralization total, an uncommon observation in natural fen type wetlands. These findings highlight the importance of managing soil moisture levels during the early stages of reclamation to (1) maintain relatively anaerobic soil conditions, and (2) facilitate microbial-mediated processes to fall within an acceptable range of variation comparable to undisturbed Albertan fens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".