MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415749171

Impact of functional testing results on prescription patterns of anti-anginal medication after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: results from the ROSETTA-CABG Registry.

2006· article· en· W2415749171 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Wou, Hiep Nguyen, Robert Duerr, Michael Del Core, Dominique Fourchy, Thao Huynh, Ellis Lader, Felix J. Rogers, Rashid Chaudhry, Louise Pilote

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineAnginaCalcium channel blockerMedical prescriptionCoronary artery bypass surgeryArteryBeta blockerUnstable anginaAnesthesiaCalciumHeart failureMyocardial infarctionPharmacology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is known to reduce angina, previous studies have suggested that anti-anginal medication use is not significantly reduced after CABG. However, it is unclear how functional testing results have an impact on anti-anginal medication prescription patterns. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether post-CABG functional testing results impact prescription patterns of anti-anginal medication during the 12 months after CABG. METHODS: The Routine versus Selective Exercise Treadmill Testing after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (ROSETTA-CABG) Registry is a prospective, multicenter study. We examined anti-anginal medication use (beta blockers, calcium channel blockers and nitrates) at discharge and at 12 months post-CABG with respect to functional testing results among 392 patients. RESULTS: Among the 392 patients, 146 had at least one functional test over the 12-month follow up period. Among the 146 patients, 17% had positive functional tests, 69% had negative tests, and 14% had indeterminate tests. Both beta blocker and calcium channel blocker use did not increase from discharge to 12 months following a positive test (N = 25) (84% vs. 80%; p = NS; 16% vs. 16%; p = NS), while nitrate use increased seven-fold (4% vs. 28%; p = 0.03). However, following a negative test (N = 100), beta blocker use only decreased modestly (85% vs. 70%; p = 0.01), while both calcium channel blocker and nitrate use were unchanged (30% vs. 20%; p = NS; 4% vs. 6%; p = NS, respectively). Following an indeterminate test (N = 21), anti-anginal medication use was unchanged (p = NS for all 3 classes of medication). CONCLUSION: The use of anti-anginal medication is only modestly reduced after CABG, and functional testing results during the first year post-CABG do not have a strong impact on prescription patterns of anti-anginal agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207