MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Use of X-ray CT scan to characterize the evolution of the hydraulic properties of a soil under drainage conditions

2016· article· en· W2415819199 on OpenAlexafffund
Yann Périard, Silvio José Gumière, Long Bao Le, Alain N. Rousseau, Jean Caron

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoderma · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHydraulic conductivityDrainageSoil scienceGeotechnical engineeringPorosityPedotransfer functionVadose zoneFractal dimensionGeologyEnvironmental scienceSoil texturePorous mediumSoil waterFractalMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characterization of soil hydraulic properties is essential for modelling water flow and solute transport in the vadose zone. These properties are often assessed assuming that the soil is a non-deformable (rigid) porous medium. However, under real conditions, such as those found in agricultural systems, the soil is constantly exposed to external stresses induced by farm machinery and by wetting and drying cycles, which constantly modify the soil hydraulic properties. The main objective of this work was to develop a methodological framework based on X-ray CT scanning to predict the spatio-temporal evolution of the hydraulic properties of a soil under drainage conditions. The methodological framework combines the particle size distribution of a soil and the fractal dimension of its porosity obtained from X-ray CT scans to predict the saturated hydraulic conductivity and volumetric deformation of a soil column. The results show that the proposed framework provides a realistic description of the spatio-temporal evolution of the hydraulic properties of a soil during the drainage process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeodermaSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207