Revascularization and heart attack outcomes.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This article focuses on rates of revascularization and mortality among people admitted to hospital after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DATA SOURCE: The hospital data are from the Person-oriented information Database. Information on deaths is from the Canadian Mortality Database. ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES: Hospital records for Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia were linked to identify AMI patients admitted between April 1, 1995 and March 31, 1996. Patients with no admission for AMI in the previous 12 months were followed for one year to determine what percentage underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and/or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The risk of being revascularized and the risk of dying were estimated. MAIN RESULTS: In the year after hospitalization, 25% of AMI patients were revascularized. Rates of revascularization were relatively low for women, very elderly people, and individuals with other health problems. Revascularization was significantly associated with a lower risk of dying for male, but not female, AMI patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".