Universal corner entanglement of Dirac fermions and gapless bosons from the continuum to the lattice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A quantum critical (QC) fluid exhibits universal subleading corrections to the area law of its entanglement entropies. In two dimensions, when the partition involves a corner of angle $\ensuremath{\theta}$, the subleading term is logarithmic with coefficient ${a}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}}(\ensuremath{\theta})$ for the $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-R\'enyi entropy. In the smooth limit $\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\pi},{a}_{1}(\ensuremath{\theta})$ yields the central charge of the stress tensor when the QC point is described by a conformal field theory (CFT). For general R\'enyi indices and angles, ${a}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}}(\ensuremath{\theta})$ is richer and few general results exist. We study ${a}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}}(\ensuremath{\theta})$ focusing on two benchmark CFTs, the free Dirac fermion and boson. We perform numerical lattice calculations to obtain high precision results in $\ensuremath{\theta},\ensuremath{\alpha}$ regimes hitherto unexplored. We derive field theory estimates for ${a}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}}(\ensuremath{\theta})$, including exact results, and demonstrate an excellent quantitative match with our numerical calculations. We also develop and test strong lower bounds, which apply to both free and interacting QC systems. Finally, we comment on the near collapse of ${a}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}}(\ensuremath{\theta})$ for various theories, including interacting $O(N)$ models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".