Numerical study on heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of R410A condensation in horizontal circular mini/micro‐tubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of condensation for R410A inside horizontal circular tubes with inner diameters ranging from 0.25–4 mm were investigated numerically. The effects of mass flux, vapour quality, tube diameters, and gravity on heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics were discussed. Liquid‐vapour interfaces and stream‐traces were also presented to give a better understanding of these effects on the condensing flow. Numerical heat transfer coefficients and pressure gradients fitted well with the empirical correlations. The results indicate that local heat transfer coefficients and pressure drop increase with increasing mass flux, vapour quality, and with decreasing tube diameters. A thin liquid film is formed at the upper part of the tube in mini‐channels, while a symmetrical annular flow is observed in microchannels. A vortex with its core lying at the bottom of the tube is formed in the tubes with an inner diameter of 4 mm, while the stream‐traces start from the z ‐axis and point to the liquid‐vapour interface when d h is 0.25 mm. The gravity effect on heat transfer is important in larger tubes at lower vapour quality, where stratified flow may occur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".