MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416022617 · doi:10.1080/10618600.2016.1195273

Locally Sparse Estimator for Functional Linear Regression Models

2016· article· en· W2416022617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsEstimatorLinear modelLinear regressionComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new locally sparse (i.e., zero on some subregions) estimator for coefficient functions in functional linear regression models is developed based on a novel functional regularization technique called “fSCAD.” The nice shrinkage property of fSCAD allows the proposed estimator to locate null subregions of coefficient functions without over shrinking nonzero values of coefficient functions. Additionally, a roughness penalty is incorporated to control the roughness of the locally sparse estimator. Our method is theoretically sounder and computationally simpler than existing methods. Asymptotic analysis reveals that the proposed estimator is consistent and can identify null subregions with probability tending to one. Extensive simulations confirm the theoretical analysis and show excellent numerical performance of the proposed method. Practical merit of locally sparse modeling is demonstrated by two real applications. Supplemental materials for the article are available online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it