MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2416037827 · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-000-3_30

Monitoring Protein Kinase A Activities Using Expressed Substrate in Live Cells

2006· review· en· W2416037827 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Wang, X. Johné Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein kinase AEpitopePhosphorylationMolecular biologyKinaseBiochemistryBiologyIntracellularChemistryAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein kinase A (PKA) activity is regulated by intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Conventional protein kinase assays after cell lysis are hence not suitable for analyzing PKA activities. In this chapter, we describe a new method for monitoring PKA activity in live cells. A triparti substrate for PKA (Myr-HA-beta2AR-C) is constructed that contains an N-terminal myristylation sequence followed by an antigenic hemagglutinin epitope tag and a substrate motif (the C-terminal tail of human beta2 adrenergic receptor). The PKA phosphorylation status of the substrate in frog oocytes is determined either by two-dimensional electrophoresis followed by HA epitope immunoblotting or by direct SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using anti-P-beta2 adrenergic receptor antibodies specifically recognizing the PKA-phosphorylated C-terminus. We also describe the application of this strategy in mammalian somatic cells through DNA transfection. Myr-HA-beta2AR-C should be widely adaptable as an in vivo PKA activity indicator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biology→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→