Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following the general historical overview of Theodor W. Adorno's work offered in Part I, Part II focuses on its distinct philosophical dimensions. Contributors examine Adorno's philosophy under traditional rubrics: logic, metaphysics, ontology, epistemology and aesthetics; moral, social and political philosophy, as well as the philosophy of culture and the philosophy of history. Their examination reveals that Adorno completely rethinks these traditional areas of philosophical enquiry in his relentless critique of damaged life under capitalism. Alison Stone's essay serves as an excellent introduction to Adorno's decidedly non-traditional mode of thought. After describing Hegel's transformation of Kant's transcendental logic into a dialectical logic, Stone explains how Adorno turns Hegel's dialectics into a negative dialectics. Adorno makes use of dialectics, not to trace the development of concepts, but to explore social phenomena such as myth and enlightenment, and more broadly still, to grasp the historical relationship between nature and culture. Although nature and culture have been entwined throughout human history, negative dialectics reveals that our historically conditioned ideas about nature do not exhaust it: nature remains stubbornly non-identical with respect to all our conceptions of it. Stone's account of Adorno's dialectically inflected non-identity thinking issues in an analysis of his employment of constellations of concepts to apprehend objects that are at one and the same time bound up with concepts and fundamentally heterogeneous with respect to them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.385 | 0.222 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".