MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416111632

La conformità della volontà umana con la Volontà di Dio da una prospettiva biblica e patristica, negli autori dei primi dodici secoli

2014· article· it· W2416111632 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alberto Mestre

Bibliographic record

VenueAlpha Omegan · 2014
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Philosophy and Theology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObedienceTheme (computing)GospelPhilosophyAbandonment (legal)ScholarshipConformityCharacter (mathematics)TheologyHumanitiesPsychologyLawSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary: The theme of the conformity of man’s will to God’s will is somewhat neglected in current theological scholarship. Although it could seem like an exclusively spiritual theme, this article will show that throughout history it was also a genuinely moral issue. The article approaches the question first in Matthew’s Gospel. This brief yet important biblical study prepares the ground for a study of the theme in some Patristic and Medieval authors. Key Words: conformity, Will of God, Will of the Father, obedience, self-abandonment to divine will. Parole chiave: conformita, Volonta di Dio, Volonta del Padre, obbedienza, abbandono alla Volonta divina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlpha OmeganSame topicMedieval Philosophy and TheologyFrench-language works237,207