MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416113235

Review of current methods used in the treatment of clubfoot at initial presentation and at recurrence.

2008· article· en· W2416113235 on OpenAlexaff
Christine M. Alvarez, Mary A. De Vera, Ranjit Varghese

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubfootMedicineDeformityPresentation (obstetrics)Orthopedic surgerySurgeryPonseti method
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Idiopathic clubfoot is a common condition seen by orthopaedic surgeons and is characterized by complex three-dimensional deformity of the foot. It is recognized that clubfoot treatment is a challenging issue in orthopaedics because it is an ongoing process, beginning in early infancy and continuing until the patient has reached skeletal maturity. This review article summarizes two important stages of clubfoot treatment. First, methods of initial correction-including nonoperative, semi-operative, and operative techniques-that have been used in the last 20 years are described. Second, the management of the recurrent clubfoot is discussed in terms of methods used to address specific deformities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.230
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207