MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416120526 · doi:10.7567/apex.9.072201

Plasmonic properties of superconductor–insulator–superconductor waveguide

2016· article· en· W2416120526 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Express · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmonTerahertz radiationSuperconductivityInsulator (electricity)WaveguideOptoelectronicsRealization (probability)Materials scienceOpticsPhysicsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The simultaneous realization of low propagation loss and subwavelength mode localization remains one of the critical challenges in plasmonics. Aiming to simultaneously realize low propagation loss and subwavelength mode localization in plasmonics, we introduce a class of low-loss and deeply confined guiding schemes utilizing an alternative plasmonic material, i.e., a superconductor (SC). The optical properties of a SC–insulator–SC (SCISC) waveguide are analyzed both at terahertz (THz) and telecommunication (TC) frequencies. The SCISC waveguide features a deep-subwavelength confinement with a mode length as small as λ/6000 (λ/18) for THz (TC) frequency, while the propagation length can be extended up to 400 mm (1 mm).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it