Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce quatrième numéro de la revue Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé (PISTES) nous présente un horizon élargi pour réfléchir sur les multiples relations existantes entre le travail et la santé.En effet, nous inaugurons dans ce numéro une nouvelle rubrique intitulée « Atelier de réflexion ».Le texte de David, Volkoff, Cloutier et Derriennic présenté dans cette rubrique est le résultat d'une réflexion amorcée dans le cadre du deuxième séminaire franco-québécois sur le vieillissement et la santé qui a eu lieu à Montréal en juillet 2000.Ce texte a servi de base à la discussion lors de l'atelier qui réunissait plusieurs chercheurs de différentes disciplines.Afin de poursuivre cette démarche, nous avons demandé à cinq collègues de nous fournir leur réaction au texte.Le débat est lancé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".