MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

63 Post-concussion syndrome (PCS): parent and youth experience with school and ongoing concussion symptoms

2015· article· en· W2416216579 on OpenAlexaff
Erin Selci, Stephanie Chu, Michael J. Ellis, Lesley Ritchie, Kelly Russell

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionFeelingAnxietyPost-concussion syndromePsychologySuicide preventionPoison controlClinical psychologyMental healthInjury preventionPsychiatryMedicineSocial psychologyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statement of purpose Post-concussion syndrome (PCS) refers to symptoms that last more than one month after a concussion, which increases the risk for anxiety, depression and poor academic performance. Our objective was to examine how parents and youth cope with persistent concussion symptoms and navigating the school system after diagnosis of PCS. Methods/approach Two focus groups were conducted: one with youth who developed PCS and one with their parents. A semi-structured interview including questions regarding concussion symptoms and academic experiences and accommodations was administered. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed to identify themes. Results Parent (n = 6) and youth (n = 6) focus groups identified three common themes: (1) a need for the school system to have increased understanding of PCS and improved academic accommodations for these students; (2) PCS was associated with mental health complications (e.g., feelings of isolation) and pressure upon returning to school; and (3) parental frustration associated with managing return to learn expectations and their child’s recovery. Two contrasting themes between parent and youth groups emerged. First, parents experienced guilt because they questioned if their child exaggerated symptoms verse youth report of only lying about feeling better to return to everyday activities. Second, parents and youth differed on whether the youth felt bullied. Conclusions PCS youth face challenges when returning to school and expressed a desire for increased academic understanding/accommodation. This is attainable through increased awareness and education in the schools. To improve parent and youth mental health during recovery from PCS, support groups may aide to decrease feelings of isolation and frustration. Significance and contributions The findings bring attention for improved PCS education in the school system, as well as the need for community support of families who have a child diagnosed with PCS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstractsSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207