Luteolin Impacts on the DNA Damage Pathway in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) exhibited high chemoresistance to current treatments. Here we aimed at identifying and repositioning approved drugs that could be selectively toxic toward OSCC cells. Through a cell-based drug screening of 1,280 chemical molecules, we selected compounds lethal to oral cancer SCC-25 cells, while sparing normal keratinocyte HaCaT cells. Within the chemical library, the natural flavonoid luteolin was identified as a potent cytotoxic agent against oral cancer cells in vitro, along with metixene hydrochloride and nitazoxanide. Of note, they exhibit low toxicity and high efficiency compared to the standard-of-care, such as cisplatin and the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor tyrphostin. From a molecular standpoint, luteolin causes phosphorylation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and H2AX in a DNA repair pathway and can be efficiently combined with a checkpoint kinase (CHK) pharmacological inhibitor. Thus, luteolin emerges as a potent cytotoxic and/or adjuvant therapy in oral cancer, as it is a natural compound presenting better effects in vitro compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Future in vivo exploration is next required to provide the proof-of-concept that luteolin could be an efficient anticancer molecule.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".