MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Maity<i>et al.</i>reply:

2015· letter· ru· W2416538177 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tuhin Maity, Sudipta Goswami, Dipten Bhattacharya, Saibal Roy

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2015
Typeletter
Languageru
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondation de l’Université du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueScience Foundation Ireland
KeywordsPhysicsTheoretical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we reply to the concerns raised by Harres et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 099703 (2015)] about some of the results reported in our original paper [T. Maity et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 107201 (2013)]. We show that the magnetic hysteresis loops are not minor and both path dependency of exchange bias and presence of superspin glass phase in the nanocomposite are indisputable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207