MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416551304 · doi:10.1080/15325008.2015.1131770

A Study of Magnetic Amplifier-based Power Flow Controller for Power System Stability Improvement

2016· article· en· W2416551304 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Components and Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)AmplifierMagnetic amplifierControl theory (sociology)EngineeringElectric power systemPower (physics)Electronic engineeringRF power amplifierComputer sciencePhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a magnetic amplifier-based power flow controller as a new approach to control power flow based on a magnetically saturated reactor concept. The magnetic amplifier-based power flow controller uses the magnetic field as control medium to decrease the operating energy losses and increase system reliability. By providing continuous impedance, the magnetic amplifier-based power flow controller can suppress the inter-area oscillation and improve the system stability. A model of magnetic amplifier-based power flow controller is built and verified by lab experiments. A control strategy implementing the magnetic amplifier-based power flow controller is proposed to demonstrate the application of this new device to damp low-frequency oscillation in an interconnected power system. A comparative analysis of the controller's performance is carried out and incorporated with various input signals and multiple loading conditions. The simulations are conducted by power systems CAD (PSCAD, Manitoba Hydro International Ltd., Winnipeg, Canada). The results show the effectiveness of the controller in damping inter-area oscillations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it