A Comparison of Ribonucleotide Reductase Activities inNormal Human Fibroblast Strains with Their TransformedCounterparts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this investigation was to examine the relationship between levels of ribonucleotide reductase activity and transformation of two human cell strains. Enzyme activity levels were elevated by 3.2- to 3.5-fold in transformed cells compared directly to the normal human fibroblast strains from which they were derived. There did not appear to be a general correlation between elevated ribonucleotide reductase and increased proliferation abilities as has been previously observed with some rodent tumor cell lines. In keeping with the rise in reductase activity, human transformed cells were relatively more resistant to the cytotoxic effects of hydroxyurea, an antitumor agent whose site of action is ribonucleotide reductase. This indicates that an important point to be considered during drug therapy aimed at the reductase, is the greater sensitivity of normal compared to transformed cells due to differences in enzyme activity. The results of this investigation support the view that an increased ability to reduce ribonucleotides is an important step towards the development of a neoplastic program in human cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it