MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416574153 · doi:10.1002/wcm.2686

Mesh adaptive direct search approach for D2D resource management

2016· article· en· W2416574153 on OpenAlexafffund
Mushtaq Ahmad, Muhammad Naeem, Ashfaq Ahmed, Muhammad Iqbal, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

VenueWireless Communications and Mobile Computing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationInterference (communication)Resource allocationCellular networkConstraint (computer-aided design)Integer (computer science)Optimization problemWireless networkWirelessDistributed computingAlgorithmComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)MathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Device‐to‐device (D2D) communications are being considered a way forward to achieve higher data rate targets for futuristic wireless networks. D2D introduces interference among cellular users and D2D users. A joint resource allocation (JRA) strategy in cellular network with D2D functionality can definitely enhance overall data rate. The strategy under consideration maximizes the overall data rate of cellular network besides meeting threshold of power and interference constraints. The JRA is a class of mixed integer non‐linear constraint optimization problems and is NP hard. Because of discrete nature of variables in the problem, optimal solution performs extensive search of integer variables, and problem becomes exponentially complex with the increasing number of user pairs. In this paper, mesh adaptive direct search algorithm is applied to solve the aforementioned problem. The algorithm is suitable for complex problems of combinatorial nature to solve the JRA strategy in D2D. The proposed algorithm converges to optimal solution within acceptable computational iterations. Simulation results of system capacity and interference also demonstrate the suitability of the proposed approach viz‐a‐viz other algorithms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWireless Communications and Mobile ComputingSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207