MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416584960

El constitutivo de la Escritura, como “Palabra de Dios por Inspiración”

2010· article· es· W2416584960 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
CP Antonio M. Artola

Bibliographic record

VenueAlpha Omegan · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious and Theological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExegesisHermeneuticsPhilosophyTheologyTriad (sociology)Sociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this assay, prof. Artola exposes the theological triangle of the theology of the Inspiration: Scripture, Inspiration, Hermeneutics, throughout the history of this triad in biblical theology: from Inspiration in the Bible, in Origen and Augustine, in Abelard an d Thomas Aquinas, in Soto, Cano e Banez, up to the new model in DV 24 of the Second Vatican Council. This new model has to do with the nature of the Bible, as the Word of God, of Inspiration, as motive of its writtenn nature, and of Hermeneutics, as exegesis of the Bible under the action of the same Hoy Spirit, by whom it was written.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlpha OmeganSame topicReligious and Theological StudiesFrench-language works237,207