MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416639871 · doi:10.1093/ajhp/59.16.1537

Stability of cefazolin in heparinized and nonheparinized peritoneal dialysis solutions

2002· article· en· W2416639871 on OpenAlexaff
Chia‐Chao Wu, Da-Peng Wang, Chi-Yin Wong, Yuh‐Feng Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsNational Defence Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral hospitalCefazolinPharmacyMedicineLibrary scienceFamily medicineComputer scienceAntibioticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Stability of cefazolin in heparinized and nonheparinized peritoneal dialysis solutions Get access Chia-Chao Wu, M.D., Chia-Chao Wu, M.D. Chief Resident Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center (NDMC), Taipei, Taiwan Address correspondence to Dr. Wu at the Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, No. 325, Section 2, Chung-Kung Road, Neiho 114, Taipei, Taiwan, or to wucc@ndmctsgh.edu.tw Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Da-Peng Wang, Ph.D., Da-Peng Wang, Ph.D. Professor School of Pharmacy, NDMC Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Chi-Yin Wong, M.D., Chi-Yin Wong, M.D. Associate Professor and Head of Orthopaedics Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Yuh-Feng Lin, M.D. Yuh-Feng Lin, M.D. Associate Professor and Head of Nephrology Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, NDMC Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Volume 59, Issue 16, 15 August 2002, Pages 1537–1538, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/59.16.1537 Published: 15 August 2002

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Health-System PharmacySame topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207