Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase to AlanineAminotransferase Ratio in Human and Experimental AlcoholicLiver Disease: Relationship to Histologic Changes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the relationship between the ratio of serum aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) to alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) and histologic changes in human and experimental alcoholic liver disease. The patient population included 52 hospitalized patients enrolled in a Veterans Administration Cooperative study. The experimental animal group consisted of male Wistar rats fed an ethanol-liquid diet. Of the 52 patients with alcoholic hepatitis, 33 had evidence of cirrhosis. The mean +/- SD for the ASAT/ALAT ratio in the group with alcoholic hepatitis and no cirrhosis was 1.47 +/- 0.84, the mean +/- SD in the group with hepatitis and cirrhosis was significantly higher (2.68 +/- 1.32, p less than 0.01). There was no difference in the ratio between the rats with and without liver fibrosis. The cause for the increased ASAT/ALAT ratio in serum in the presence of cirrhosis is unknown and may reflect more severe liver damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".