Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommario: Il contributo esamina alcuni apporti meno esplorati del pensiero di Maritain al Concilio e al dibattito postconciliare: l’attenzione verso la sapienza filosofica, la questione della verita, il rapporto ragione-fede, il realismo della conoscenza umana. In tale ambiti, di particolare rilievo risultano le riflessioni elaborate da Maritain in un memorandum per Paolo VI del 1965, in Il contadino della Garonna del 1966, e nel “Credo del popolo di Dio” di Paolo VI (1968), di cui si ricostruisce la genesi e la stesura proposta dal filosofo francese. Parole chiave: Maritain, Concilio Vaticano II, crisi postconciliare, verita, ragione e fede, conoscenza reale Abstract: The article examines some lesser known contributions of Maritain’s thought to Vatican II and to the post-conciliar debate: namely, a focus on philosophical wisdom, the question of truth, the relation between faith and reason, and the realism of human knowledge. Particularly relevant in these themes are Maritain’s reflections contained in a memorandum written to Paul VI (1965), in The Peasant of the Garonne (1966), and in Paul VI’s “Credo of the People of God”, of which one can discern the development and structure proposed by the French philosopher. Key words: Maritain, Second Vatican Council, post-conciliar crisis, truth, faith and reason, realism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".