L’influsso di J. Maritain sul Concilio Vaticano II
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommario: Il contributo esamina alcuni apporti meno esplorati del pensiero di Maritain al Concilio e al dibattito postconciliare: l’attenzione verso la sapienza filosofica, la questione della verita, il rapporto ragione-fede, il realismo della conoscenza umana. In tale ambiti, di particolare rilievo risultano le riflessioni elaborate da Maritain in un memorandum per Paolo VI del 1965, in Il contadino della Garonna del 1966, e nel “Credo del popolo di Dio” di Paolo VI (1968), di cui si ricostruisce la genesi e la stesura proposta dal filosofo francese. Parole chiave: Maritain, Concilio Vaticano II, crisi postconciliare, verita, ragione e fede, conoscenza reale Abstract: The article examines some lesser known contributions of Maritain’s thought to Vatican II and to the post-conciliar debate: namely, a focus on philosophical wisdom, the question of truth, the relation between faith and reason, and the realism of human knowledge. Particularly relevant in these themes are Maritain’s reflections contained in a memorandum written to Paul VI (1965), in The Peasant of the Garonne (1966), and in Paul VI’s “Credo of the People of God”, of which one can discern the development and structure proposed by the French philosopher. Key words: Maritain, Second Vatican Council, post-conciliar crisis, truth, faith and reason, realism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it