MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2416792394 · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-243-4_7

In Vitro and In Vivo Silencing of the Androgen Receptor

2011· article· en· W2416792394 on OpenAlexafffund
Helen Cheng, Eric Leblanc, Paul S. Rennie

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLNCaPAndrogen receptorProstate cancerIn vivoGene knockdownGene silencingCancer researchIn vitroSmall hairpin RNAAndrogenChemistryMedicineBiologyInternal medicineCancerHormoneApoptosisBiochemistryGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The androgen receptor (AR) plays a pivotal role in the progression of prostate cancer from the androgen-dependent to the castration-resistant state, making it a potential target for therapy. In this chapter, we describe the preparation and use of sublines of LNCaP and C4-2 human prostate cancer cells which have been engineered to stably express a doxycycline (DOX)-inducible AR shRNA in order to study the in vitro and in vivo effects of AR knockdown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→