MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2417014160 · doi:10.1080/17474086.2016.1198895

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic pupura (TTP) dinner symposium proceedings

2016· article· en· W2417014160 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katerina Pavenski, Spero R. Cataland, Johanna A. Kremer Hovinga, Mari Thomas, Karen Vanhoorelbeke

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Hematology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraMedicineIntensive care medicineAlternative medicineThrombosisFamily medicineImmunologyInternal medicinePlateletPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Answering TTP was established to engage the thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) community to further the common goals of patient support, education of patients and medical professionals, and the funding of research to improve the treatment and care of TTP patients. Answering TTP convened a dinner symposium on 23 June 2015 in Toronto, Canada during the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Congress to bring TTP clinicians and research together to highlight the key clinical and research questions in the field. These questions are increasingly important given the recent advances and novel therapies that have or will soon enter clinical study for patients with TTP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of HematologySame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207