A set of isogenic auxotrophic strains for constructing multiple gene deletion mutants and parasexual crossings in Aspergillus niger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To construct a set of isogenic auxotrophic strains in Aspergillus niger suited for creating multiple gene deletion mutants and executing parasexual crossings, we have combined mutations in genes involved in colour pigmentation (fwnA and olvA) with well-selectable auxotrophic markers (pyrG, nicB, argB, and adeA). All markers, except for the pyrG marker, were introduced by targeted deletion, omitting UV mutagenesis of the strains. Aspergillus oryzae orthologous genes of the argB, nicB, and adeA markers were used as heterologous selection markers, and all markers were shown to complement to respective auxotrophic A. niger mutants. A quadruple auxotrophic marker was further constructed suitable for multiple gene deletions. Genome sequencing of two auxotrophic colour mutants JN3.2 (olvA::pyrG, argB::hygB) and JN6.2 (olvA::pyrG, nicB::hygB) revealed four SNPs between them in non-coding regions, indicating a high level of isogenicity between both strains. The availability of near-isogenic complementary auxotrophic colour mutants facilitates the selection of diploids and the isolation of haploid segregants from the diploid using the parasexual cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".