Results of the Research on Prevention of Mobbing/Bullying as a Psycho-Social Stressor when Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the results of the empirical research aimed to identify the prevalence of mobbing/bullying as a psycho-social stressor in socially responsible organizations as well as in the ones that do not adhere to a sense of corporate social responsibility. The aim of the research: to identify the prevalence of MBPS in organizations carrying corporate social responsibility and in organizations not practicing corporate social responsibility. The objectives of the research: (1) to validate the methodology of the research specifying the structure of the instrument; (2) to present the psychosomatic characteristics of the instrument; (3) to assess the prevalence of MBPS in regard to socio-demographic criteria. The methods of the research: analysis and synthesis of scientific literature, questionnaire survey based on validated questionnaire, statistical analysis and comparison. The paper presents the introduction, the methodology of the research, the psycho-metric characteristics of the questionnaire and the socio-demographic data from the respondents as well other aspects in regard to the data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".