MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2417102809 · doi:10.4000/recherchestravaux.811

Otium et décadence chez Baudelaire dans « Au lecteur », « Bénédiction » et « Spleen » I et II

2016· article· fr· W2417102809 on OpenAlex
Diemo Landgraf

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches & travaux · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesDictionPhilosophyArtPoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Étant étroitement lié à l’ennui, l’otium s’avère foncièrement problématique chez Baudelaire. C’est la sphère de la vie où l’individu dispose de plus d’autonomie — une autonomie ambivalente dans la modernité, où après l’abolition des structures religieuses et sociales traditionnelles, l’individu lui-même doit donner du sens à sa vie. Il s’agit là de l’origine du nihilisme et de la crise existentielle de la modernité pour laquelle Baudelaire utilise le terme de décadence dans ses essais sur Edgar Allan Poe. Notre contribution analyse cette relation dans des poèmes clés des Fleurs du Mal : « Au lecteur », « Bénédiction » et « Spleen » I et II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it