MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2417252439 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-259-2_8

Race and Racial Justice in Ontario Educationi

2015· book-chapter· en· W2417252439 on OpenAlexaffabout
Goli Rezai-Rashti, Allison Segeren, Wayne Martino

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvisibilityRace (biology)Equity (law)Context (archaeology)Economic JusticeGender studiesPolitical scienceCriminologySociologyPublic administrationLawGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter we draw attention to the invisibility of race and antiracism in Ontario’s education system by focusing on the Ontario government’s inclusivity and anti-bullying policies in the context of larger neoliberal strategies (Martino & Rezai-Rashti, 2012, 2013). Drawing on the work of policy sociologists (Ball, 2006; Rizvi & Lingard, 2010; Ozga, 2009), this chapter focuses on the dilution of race in policy discourses of equity education in Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207