MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2417254829 · doi:10.1093/pch/6.6.322

The place of quinolones in paediatric anti-infective therapy

2001· article· en· W2417254829 on OpenAlexaff
Joanne M. Langley

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeutropenia and Cancer Infections
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnti-Infective AgentsIntensive care medicineMicrobiologyAntimicrobialBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluoroquinolones are synthetic derivatives of nalidixic acid with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, oral bioavailability and excellent tissue penetration. Although five agents are licensed in Canada (Table 1), none are approved for use in children, growing adolescents or pregnant women because of an association with arthropathy in the weight-bearing joints of some juvenile animal species (1). Since the last note on quinolones by a committee of the Canadian Paediatric Society was published in 1992 (2), paediatric experience with this class of antimicrobial agents has increased. This note briefly reviews some of the accumulating evidence for the use of fluoroquinolones in children in specific clinical settings. Fluoroquinolones licensed in Canada Systemic formulations listed; Quinolones are also available in a variety of ophthalmic and otic preparations Fluoroquinolones licensed in Canada Systemic formulations listed; Quinolones are also available in a variety of ophthalmic and otic preparations Quinolones inhibit DNA gyrase, an enzyme that is unique to bacteria and required for DNA replication, repair and recombination. The spectrum of organisms susceptible to quinolones includes most Gram-positive bacteria, including some streptococci and most Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. While all fluoroquinolones are structurally similar, modifications have led to newer agents with activity against streptococci (including penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae), increased activity against staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant strains), and activity against mycoplasma and chlamydia. Bacterial resistance to quinolones occurs through chromosomal mutations in DNA gyrase or the modification of the bacterial outer membrane, resulting in decreased drug permeability. Up to 20% of Pseudomonas auriginosa may be resistant to quinolones (3). Because quinolones can be given orally, they are appealing agents for use when P aeruginosa may be the etiological agent because the alternative option is intravenous therapy. Quinolones have been reported to be effective in children with febrile neutropenic episodes (4,5), urinary tract infections (6), chronic suppurative otitis media (7), exacerbation of cystic fibrosis (8,9) and enteric infections in developing countries (6). In a rabbit model, quinolones were efficacious in the treatment of meningitis due to S pneumoniae, including strains resistant to penicillin and other beta-lactams (10). According to case reports, quinolones have been successfully used in the treatment of central nervous system infections in infants and children. Although a review in the Cochrane Collaboration Issue 4 (11) found quinolone otic preparations to be more effective than nonquinolone agents in reducing ear discharge and eradicating bacteria associated with chronic otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation, the trials did not include children. A ciprofloxacin opthalmic solution was found to be similar in efficacy to a tobramycin ophthalmic solution in one multicentre study of acute bacterial conjunctivitis in children (12). Fluoroquinolones are generally well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse events involve the gastrointestinal tract (nausea and diarrhea in 7% of patients), the central nervous system (eg, headache, dizziness, insomnia in 1% to 6% of patients) and skin (photosensitivity in 2% of patients). These adverse effects are reversible. Extensive exposure to ultraviolet light should be avoided during quinolone use. A slight prolongation of the Q-T interval in adult patients taking grepafloxacin and sparfloxacin has been reported (13); however, neither of these products are available in Canada. Drug interactions may occur with many agents, including antiarrhythmic agents, cimetidine, antacids, phenytoin and theophylline. Probably, the most worrisome side effect of quinolone use in children is the potential for arthropathy. While clearly demonstrated in various animal models, joint damage has not been a notable sequelae of quinolone use in humans. An exhaustive review of quinolone use in over 7000 children in all papers published to January 1997 identified 10 case reports of suspected quinoloneassociated arthropathy; all but one of the patients had a complete clinical recovery (14). Over 30 multipatient studies in skeletally immature children who received ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin or ofloxacin have shown no arthralgia beyond the level of severity expected as a part of their underlying illness (14). Eleven of the studies followed patients (n=530) to evaluate joint change for six months to 12 years and did not show quinolone-induced effects or alteration in linear growth. The authors concluded that the maximum risk of chondrotoxicity would not be greater than one in 2348 patients or approximately 0.04%. Paediatric studies published since 1997 (5,8,9,15) have not reported arthopathy. Quinolones offer certain paediatric patients with susceptible flora (eg, bronchopulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis, chronic ear infections, complicated urinary tract infection) the option of an oral treatment regimen on an outpatient basis. Quinolones should be prescribed with prudence because the total number of children studied during and after quinolone use is less than 10,000. This means that rare but serious adverse events may not have been detected yet. Currently, there are no routine indications for the use of quinolones in the paediatric population. The costs and benefits of this class of agents must be considered in therapeutic decision-making in situations in which alternative safe treatments are not available. Given the limited experience of quinolone use in children, this class of anti-infective agents should only be considered when other safe and effective therapies are not available. The clinical settings in which other antimicrobial options may not be available include resistant microorganisms, inaccessibility of the intravenous route, or the wish on the part of a patient, parents or physician to choose an oral therapy rather than an intravenous route. In such cases, the costs and benefits of a therapeutic decision to use quinolones should be discussed with all parties, taking into consideration any new evidence available in the medical literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFrench-language works237,207