Evaluating the Effect of Serine Proteases on Collagenase Activity during Human Islet Isolation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inconsistencies in human islet yields after collagenase digestion have been attributed to the activation of endogenous enzymes of the donor pancreas. It has been suggested that pancreatic serine proteases contribute to the proteolysis of collagenase. This study defined the effects of endogenous enzymes within the pancreas on pancreas dissociation during collagenase digestion. Levels of collagenase activity from samples taken throughout several steps in islet isolation procedures, both with and without the addition of the serine protease inhibitor Pefabloc, were determined by a spectrophotometric assay using N-[3-(2-furyl)acryloyl]-Leu-Gly-Pro-Ala as the substrate. Results clearly demonstrated that the level of collagenase activity remains stable throughout the isolation procedure despite differences in the donor factors from several cadaveric donor pancreases. This was further demonstrated by observing no difference in activity levels after incubating commercial collagenase preparations with serine proteases and analyzing by means of collagenase activity and SDS-PAGE. These data show that the presence of serine proteases does not affect the level of collagenase activity; however, they likely damage the islet cells upon prolonged digestion of the pancreatic tissue. Further efforts at examining exogenous and endogenous enzyme levels may result in the development of an enzyme cocktail that is both stable and effective for digesting the human pancreas while preserving islet function and viability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".