[Experimentation of care partners program in psychiatry: the model Montreal].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The approach of the partnership of care and services developed by the direction collaboration dans patient partnership (DCPP) of the Faculty of medicine of the University of Montreal, considers the patient as a full care actor, in the same way as healthcare professionals, his experientiel knowledges are recognized and the patient develops gradually his self-determination. Since 2010, in order to allow cultural changes involved with this approach, the 'Program Partners of Care' (PPC) facilitated resource patient' integration and involvement into Continuous Improvement Committees (CIC), within 29 general and specialized health care teams in 19 health and social services facilities in Quebec, among wich four teams specialized in mental health. The purpose of the article is to describe briefly this approach, to demonstrate that it is successfully applicable to mental health clienteles, under certain conditions. METHOD: The evaluation of this approach arises from quantitative data of self-adminitered questionnaires by the participants of continuous Improvement Commettes, as well as a reflexive approach of the participants and the members of the DCPP to understand the processes and the implemented services. The results reveal that the objectives of transformation selected through the specialized mental health CIC refer to welcoming process in the facilities, to the period of transition from a facilities service to another one, to the patient involvement in their own Interdisciplinary Plan (IIP). Among the faciliting factors for patients' participation in thse CIC: the caregivers and managers' adaptability to adjust to a patient's pace; the identification to the best communication mechanisms to get in touch with them; faciliting discussion in small working group; an existing trust relationship with the members of the CIC; the support of the resource patients between them as well as support by coach patient of the DCPP. The members of the CIC develop a sense of pride, an energy, a new motivation and a group cohesion. The patient develop a sens of belonging to the team, they experience a higher self-esteem as well as developping a sens of usefulness, by contributing to the improvement of specialized mental health facilities. Giving back, as well as participing in the better quality of services fot the benefit of other patients make a whole lot of sense for them, this process even sometimes allows their full revovrey. In conclusion, the report reveals the applicicability of this approach in the field of the mental health. It il all the more attainable when the winning conditions as the closeness of the managers specialized in the domain, the choice of significant targets of continuous improvement for the patients are taken into account.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".