Latent tuberculosis infection, its treatment, and the control and elimination of tuberculosis.

Eliminating tuberculosis should be a high priority for public health practice for several reasons: it represents a massive burden global health in terms of costs; it is transmitted through the air we breathe, putting everyone at risk; and we have tools that are effective in targeting our activities [1]. Getting rid of latent infection must be a key component of any strategy aimed at the elimination of tuberculosis, since the largest burden of the causative microorganisms are carried by the high proportion of the world's population that is infected but does not (yet) have disease. This is particularly crucial because the microorganisms can cause a reactivation of disease, as well as potential new infection of others, many decades after the individual carrying the microorganisms has become infected. There is no question that the intervention ± i.e., medical therapy of latent tuberculosis infection ± is efficacious [2]. Moreover, the objective of screening and of offering the intervention has great merit and meets the criteria of aiming to detect unrecognized disease or its precursors in order that measures can be taken that will prevent or delay the development of disease or improve the prognosis [3], as well as the ethical requirements for implementation [4]. In this issue of IMAJ, the article by Bibi and colleagues [5] on the compliance with drug therapy for latent tuberculosis infection touches on the key issue in considering the role of this intervention in the control, and elimination, of tuberculosis. Even if the intervention is efficacious and relatively safe, it cannot hope have an impact on reducing the burden of disease unless it is applied a large proportion of the target group. The study reports that in only 16% of the probable actual number of infected individuals (taking into account those who did not complete the examination) was the intervention applied fully (i.e., the course of treatment was completed). The main reason for this low figure was the fact that many did not return for a further examination after being informed that they had a significant reaction the tuberculin skin test. A closer examination of this figure shows that in one of the highest risk groups (children born in other locations who had a high prevalence of significant skin reactions), only 5.5% of probable infected individuals completed the treatment. This low rate of adherence might reflect the fact that the screening was undertaken in a general population that did not have prior knowledge or reason be concerned about the disease. However, even in locations where health services are highly focused on encouraging participation and adherence the intervention, and where the individuals being examined are likely be aware of and concerned about the risk (e.g., contact with cases of active tuberculosis), the rate of completion of treatment remains low. In the Province of Alberta, Canada, a routine report of treatment outcome offered contacts revealed that the rate of completion of treatment among those detected have a significant reaction the tuberculin test was only 24% [6]. Even this is not sufficient have an epidemiologic impact. This is not even the whole story. In undertaking screening and preventive interventions for individuals who are not ill, it is important that the intervention itself not cause more harm than is prevented by the intervention. In an analysis of screening groups at risk of tuberculosis, we evaluated the probability of developing disease (and of developing the most infectious form, smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis) in three groups that were required undergo routine screening examinations ± immigrants with and without radiographic evidence of healed tuberculosis, and healthcare workers [7]. We determined that in order prevent a single case of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis it would be necessary treat 30 immigrants who had a scar on their chest X-ray, 278 immigrants from high prevalence countries with normal chest X-rays, and 651 healthcare professionals. The cost of this intervention can be calculated in terms of potential toxicity [8]. In the groups evaluated, it was estimated that one of these adults would die of hepatitis for every 11 cases prevented in nurses, or every 233 cases prevented in immigrants with scars. Admittedly, these figures are not particularly relevant for the children in the study reported here by Bibi et al., but they do have relevance for the recommendations concerning rather aggressive treatment of latent tuberculosis infection among immigrants that are currently being proposed [9]. For all health-related activities, it is essential maintain a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.