L’Anselmo di Hans Urs von Balthasar. L’analogia entis maturata nel dialogo con K. Barth e riletta come analogia libertatis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The figure of Anselm sheds light on some aspects of the comparison between Karl Barth and Hans Urs von Balthasar with regard to the theme of analogy. Barth’s work Anselm strongly influenced von Balthasar, yet neither conditioned nor limited the originality of the famous Catholic theologian. In his work Gloria, Balthasar tried to legitimate a theological aesthetics in which Anselm is one of the most illustrious representatives. According to Balthasar, an intellectual evolution occurs in Anselm, who is seen to depart from the «necessary reasons» of theology and give increasing importance to the truly theological theme of freedom, namely, to the relationship of the Absolute Being with relative being in the light of the self-opening of the Absolute. In Anselm the philosophical analogia entis becomes the theological analogia libertatis. The whole of theological discourse is founded upon a simple vision of the analogia libertatis between God and creature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".