MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2418328444 · doi:10.1109/eucap.2016.7481334

Bandwidth enhancement of 4×4 subarrays circularly polarized rectangular dielectric resonator antenna by sequential feeding network

2016· article· en· W2418328444 on OpenAlexaff
M. Akbari, Sh. Gupta, R. Movahedinia, Saman Zarbakhsh, Abdel-Razik Sebak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectric resonator antennaCircular polarizationGround planeBandwidth (computing)OpticsPhysicsDielectric resonatorDielectricResonatorOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsComputer scienceAntenna (radio)Microstrip

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Paper presents a 4×4 subarray dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) with capability of circular polarization for millimeter wave applications. By the 4×4 subarray DRA proposed, the bandwidth of circular polarization (CP) and gain of the DRA has been increased as compared with primary 2×2 subarray DRA. The basic antenna consists of an aperture coupled DRA. In addition, in order to obtain CP bandwidth, an X-shaped slot is etched off the ground plane. The elements are arranged in a 4×4 subarray structure and also are excited sequentially in a parallel feeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207