MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2418414209 · doi:10.4000/droitcultures.3711

La répression des violences envers les animaux sacrés dans l’Égypte ptolémaïque

2016· article· fr· W2418414209 on OpenAlexaff
Bernard Legras

Bibliographic record

VenueDroit et Cultures · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsArmand Frappier Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les sanctuaires égyptiens accueillaient des animaux sacrés « uniques » et des animaux sacralisés « multiples ». L’ensemble du dossier concernant la répression des violences envers ces animaux sacralisés dans l’Égypte ptolémaïque, comporte des sources littéraires gréco-latines et des sources documentaires grecques et égyptiennes. Il ne permet pas de conclure à l’existence de la peine de mort pour le meurtre des animaux sacralisés « multiples ». Le témoignage de Diodore, très souvent invoqué, illustre en fait une affaire de lynchage par une foule déchaînée à Alexandrie, et non le résultat d’une hypothétique sanction judicaire. Les témoignages documentaires papyrologiques, grecs et démotiques, n’en font pas mention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDroit et CulturesSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207