[Multidimensional appraisal in patients suffering from chronic idiopathic constipation].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A multidimensional appraisal of the patient suffering from chronic idiopatic constipation is used in this study. 16 consecutive patients affected by chronic idiopatic constipation defined by Rome criteria were enrolled. The following assessments were performed: radiological study of colorectal transit time using radiopaque markers, anorectal manometry, proctography, psychiatric appraisal, with the somministration of The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2, Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression, Hamilton Rating Scales for Anxiety, Toronto Alexithymia Scales, quality of life appraisal, by means of Short Form 36. The present study must be considered a pilot-study, lead on a limited champion of 16 cases; the reported data express therefore tendencies. Chronic idiopatic constipation appears to be a disturbance with a strong impact on the patient's quality of life. The study moreover confirms the hypothesis of a multifactorial genesis for chronic idiopatic constipation, in which psychopathological aspects (anxiety, depression and alessitimia in particular) and personality traits play a fundamental role, as much as the physiopathological alterations. Colorectal transit time study and anorectal manometry confirm to be valid instruments for the evaluation of physiopathological characteristics, useful for a classification of patients, particularly with respect to the presence of a normal or slowed colorectal transit and to the relief of pelvic floor dysfunctions. The differences between subgroups based on physiopathological characteristics, with respect to quality of the life and personality traits, expressed as tendency, need a confirm form studies lead on larger champions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".