Le nationalisme arabe, rétrospective et prospective : un essai
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Courant dominant il y a à peine une génération, le nationalisme arabe cède la place à l’islamisme. L’idée nationale, voire l’État-nation semblent avoir fait leur temps. Pourtant l’exercice du pouvoir en Tunisie et en Égypte de 2011 à 2013 s’avère funeste à l’islamisme ; l’échec et le rejet sont d’une rapidité remarquable. Restent entiers les problèmes et défis auxquels il était confronté: lutte pour l’indépendance, l’unité, la modernisation et le développement. Dans la mesure où ils demeurent d’actualité, l’expérience historique du nationalisme arabe ne perd pas sa pertinence. D’où l’intérêt de revisiter cette tentative de réaliser des avancées sur les quatre plans fondamentaux. Le nationalisme arabe a été le vecteur d’une quête de progrès, de modernité et d’émancipation. Il est possible qu’il appartienne définitivement au passé, mais la non-réalisation des aspirations qu’il a incarnées rend toujours concevable sa réactivation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".