MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2418778860 · doi:10.1190/geo2015-0597.1

Approximate semianalytical solutions for the electromagnetic response of a dipping-sphere interacting with conductive overburden

2016· article· en· W2418778860 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacques K. Desmarais, Richard S. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverburdenGeologyGreat circleElectrical conductorBessel functionFaraday cageGeometryMechanicsGeophysicsMathematical analysisPhysicsMathematicsGeotechnical engineeringMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Electromagnetic exploration methods have important applications for geologic mapping and mineral exploration in igneous and metamorphic terranes. In such cases, the earth is often largely resistive and the most important interaction is between a conductor of interest and a shallow, thin, horizontal sheet representing glacial tills and clays or the conductive weathering products of the basement rocks (both of which are here termed the “conductive overburden”). To this end, we have developed a theory from which the step and impulse responses of a sphere interacting with conductive overburden can be quickly and efficiently approximated. The sphere model can also be extended to restrict the currents to flow in a specific orientation (termed the dipping-sphere model). The resulting expressions are called semianalytical because all relevant relations are developed analytically, with the exception of the time-convolution integrals. The overburden is assumed to not be touching the sphere, so there is no galvanic interactions between the bodies. We make use of the dipole sphere in a uniform field and thin sheet approximations; however, expressions could be obtained for a sphere in a dipolar (or nondipolar) field using a similar methodology. We have found that there is no term related to the first zero of the relevant Bessel function in the response of the sphere alone. However, there are terms for all other zeros. A test on a synthetic model shows that the combined sphere-overburden response can be reasonably approximated using the first-order perturbation of the overburden field. Minor discrepancies between the approximate and more elaborate numerical responses are believed to be the result of numerical errors. This means that in practice, the proposed approach consists of evaluating one convolution integral over a sum of exponentials multiplied by a polynomial function. This results in an extremely simple algorithmic implementation that is simple to program and easy to run. The proposed approach also provides a simple method that can be used to validate more complex algorithms. A test on field data obtained at the Reid Mahaffy site in Northern Ontario shows that our approximate method is useful for interpreting electromagnetic data even when the background is thick. We use our approach to obtain a better estimate of the geometry and physical properties of the conductor and evaluate the conductance of the overburden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207