MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2418990646 · doi:10.2118/180797-ms

Quantification of Simulation Model Grid Size Impact on Polymer Flooding Application in Heavy Oil Heterogeneous Reservoir

2016· article· en· W2418990646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Trinidad and Tobago Section Energy Resources Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorCMG Reservoir Simulation Foundation
KeywordsReservoir simulationFlooding (psychology)GridPetroleum engineeringComputer scienceEnhanced oil recoveryWork (physics)Process (computing)Reliability (semiconductor)GeologyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Polymer flooding can be a viable alternative to enhance oil recovery of heavy oil fields. The comparison of water and polymer flooding requires a reliable reservoir numerical model to safely ensure the decision analysis including uncertainties and involving a significant amount of simulation runs. Reservoir engineers usually work-around this problem using fast models to reduce computational time; however, it is important to maintain the reliability of heterogeneous reservoir models. Therefore, the proposed work demonstrates how the grid size impacts on accuracy of results and both the time and computational resources. In addition, it is performed an analysis to establish how the typical physical phenomena related to the polymer flooding impact the applicability of the proposed methodology. A highly heterogeneous heavy oil field is used in our proposed studies. The application is conducted to assist pilot test wells. Initially, the definition of the reference strategy (OTM) is presented. In this case study, the OTM strategy is based on the optimization of location and number of wells. Secondly, the effect of grid size on the process is evaluated through two procedures: (1) DA method: a selection of grid size defined by drainage area of the selected wells; and (2) UP method: upscaling is performed in the simulation model. Then, production parameters resulting from models of both procedures (DA and UP) are compared with OTM results. The definition of which procedure is better to represent the wells of interest is performed. Finally, the impact of three polymer flooding physical phenomena (degradation, adsorption and Non-Newtonian effect) on production results is presented, in order to verify the accuracy of the generated fast models in maintained considering these effects. The DA method present good accuracy for reservoir response compared to the reference OTM results. Differently, UP models are not as accurate as DA models for production results indicators. In conclusion, the application of the methodology allows choosing the DA over the UP technique to support our decision in the investigated recovery methods, showing a reliable and fast procedure. Finally, this procedure shows excellent applicability and robustness when a typical polymer flooding study is carried out: the evaluation of physical phenomena impact on production results based on wells of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it