MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2418999

Business analytics trends and opportunities

2011· article· en· W2418999 on OpenAlexaff
Craig Statchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueConference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsIBM (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness intelligenceBusiness analyticsAnalyticsComputer scienceData scienceSoftware analyticsIBMPurchasingBig dataCloud computingKnowledge managementSoftwareBusiness analysisBusinessBusiness modelSoftware developmentMarketingData mining
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analytics (BA) remains an important research topic for the coming year. Many elements contribute to a successful BA solution. Within the business analytics team at IBM, we are looking closely at the following trends: Business Analytics Marketplace: Buyers of Analytics software are changing. Purchasing decisions are no longer made exclusively by Information Technology departments. End users have a greater role in BA than ever before. Business Intelligence: Business Intelligence is a set of methodologies, processes, architectures, and technologies that transform raw data into meaningful and useful information used to enable more effective strategic, tactical, and operational insights and decision-making -- Source: Forrester The heart of a Analytics solution is Intelligence (BI). Reporting and analysis are the main features visible to end users. Under the covers, BI is undergoing the biggest transformation since its inception over 40 years ago. Data warehouses are now more dynamic and timely. In many cases, these reporting mainstays are being replaced by ad hoc systems that can report over operational data. The shift toward Software Oriented Architecture (SOA) continues with the Cloud often being the ultimate destination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.504
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.080 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative ResearchSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207